BACK

Research and Statistics

Credit card losses from synthetic identity fraud jump

Summary

Synthetic identity fraud, in which thieves create identities for bogus people, is increasing, Aite Group finds. And losses from the fraud are expected to rise another 53 percent by 2020.

The editorial content below is based solely on the objective assessment of our writers and is not driven by advertising dollars. However, we may receive compensation when you click on links to products from our partners. Learn more about our advertising policy.

The content on this page is accurate as of the posting date; however, some of the offers mentioned may have expired. Please see the bank’s website for the most current version of card offers; and please review our list of best credit cards, or use our CardMatch™ tool to find cards matched to your needs.

While some identity thieves aim to charge purchases to your card or use your personal information to secretly open new accounts in your name, other fraudsters are busy opening new credit cards in nobody’s name.

Research and advisory firm Aite Group has been tracking the volume of credit card losses from what’s called synthetic identity fraud since 2015, and also projects its magnitude three years forward. The trend? Decidedly rising.

Credit card losses from accounts opened with fabricated identities reached $820 million in 2017, up almost 17 percent from the year before. And Aite forecasts the losses to rise another 53 percent, to almost $1.3 billion, by 2020.

As large as those figures are, Aite considers the estimates to be fairly conservative, since synthetic identity fraud is especially hard to detect. With no victim notifying the financial institution of the incident, these thefts are often miscategorized as credit losses. Only if information comes through to indicate the account is held by a false identity is it properly reclassified as identity fraud.

Study author Julie Conroy indicates the growth in synthetic identity fraud has been driven by a combination of factors, including rampant data breaches, the loosening of credit standards by financial institutions, and the 2011 randomization of Social Security numbers, which has made it harder to spot ID numbers that don’t jibe with an applicant’s age or geography.

Add to that the massive retail migration to chip cards, which has very significantly deterred point-of-purchase fraud, and thieves are having to expand into different directions to keep their theft revenues flowing.

The estimates in Aite’s study are based on interviews with 33 executives from U.S. financial services firms and fraud vendors from July 2017 to April 2018. The findings were published May 3.

Synthetic identity fraud credit card losses jump

See related: Fraudsters creating synthetic identities from personal info on web, Synthetic identity theft crimes growing fast, targeting kids, More infographics

What’s up next?

In Research and Statistics

Supreme Court OKs sports gambling – will credit cards?

Cards that allow betting at all treat it as a costly cash advance. That could change in wake of Supreme Court ruling allowing states to legalize sports betting

Published: May 15, 2018

See more stories
Credit Card Rate Report Updated: July 10th, 2019
Business
15.61%
Airline
17.59%
Cash Back
17.68%
Reward
17.58%
Student
17.79%

Questions or comments?

Contact us

Editorial corrections policies

Learn more

Join the Discussion

We encourage an active and insightful conversation among our users. Please help us keep our community civil and respectful. For your safety, do not disclose confidential or personal information such as bank account numbers or social security numbers. Anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

The editorial content on CreditCards.com is not sponsored by any bank or credit card issuer. The journalists in the editorial department are separate from the company’s business operations. The comments posted below are not provided, reviewed or approved by any company mentioned in our editorial content. Additionally, any companies mentioned in the content do not assume responsibility to ensure that all posts and/or questions are answered.