Mississippi’s attorney general sued Chase Bank for making false demands for debt against credit card customers
The editorial content below is based solely on the objective assessment of our writers and is not driven by advertising dollars. However, we may receive compensation when you click on links to products from our partners. Learn more about our advertising policy.
The content on this page is accurate as of the posting date; however, some of the offers mentioned may have expired. Please see the bank’s website for the most current version of card offers; and please review our list of best credit cards, or use our CardMatch™ tool to find cards matched to your needs.
In a complaint filed in state court Dec. 17, Attorney General Jim Hood accused the bank of making false demands for debt, filing unverified documents in court and selling debt to others backed by false affidavits. “Chase pursued Mississippi consumers for debt that they had paid or settled, they did not owe, or that they had discharged in bankruptcy,” Hood said in a statement.
The complaint, the result of an 18-month investigation, echoes allegations made in California’s lawsuit against Chase, and in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s consent order against the bank, which both took aim at robo-signing of court documents used in debt collection lawsuits.
Responding to the OCC order in September, Bill Wallace, head of Chase’s operations for consumer and community banking, said the company has overhauled its practices in the past two years and fixed the issues that affected customers.
Another 15 states are examining Chase’s collection practices, according to The Wall Street Journal, with 14 of them participating in settlement discussions.
See related:Robo-signed collection cases under fire