Research and Statistics

Feds plug loophole that prevented credit card rates from falling


The Federal Reserve fixed a problem in the wording of the Credit CARD Act that would have made consumers wait 45 days if they wanted reduced interest rates.

The content on this page is accurate as of the posting date; however, some of our partner offers may have expired. Please review our list of best credit cards, or use our CardMatch™ tool to find cards matched to your needs.

Credit card users who get interest rate reductions can reap the benefits of their lower rates immediately rather than waiting 45 days, under rules issued by the Federal Reserve.

The Fed fixed a loophole caused by wording within the Credit CARD Act of 2009 that, if left uncorrected, would have meant some consumers lucky enough to get interest rate reductions would have had to wait 45 days to enjoy the benefits. The credit card reform law, signed May 22, 2009, by President Obama, requires credit card issuers to give consumers at least 45 days’ advance notice of significant changes in their credit card terms.

The intent was to give consumers plenty of notice of credit card rate increases or fee hikes. The extra 45 days gives them time to comparison shop, find cards with better terms, use balance transfer credit cards and, if they choose,  opt out of the changes to their old accounts.

However, the 45-day requirement also would have applied to cardholders who managed to win interest rate cuts from their credit card lenders. Under the wording of the CARD Act, they would have had to wait 45 days, too — which is not what lawmakers intended.

In final credit card law guidelines published Jan. 12 by the Fed, the loophole was closed. Regulators clarified that reduction of “any component of a finance or other charge” does not require advance notice.

The 45-day notice provision of the credit card reform law took effect Aug. 20, 2009. The bulk of the credit card law measures are scheduled to take effect Feb. 22, 2010. That’s when credit card issuers will be restricted from increasing interest rates on existing account balances — except in a limited number of circumstances. (See Credit card reform law and you.)

The problem with the CARD Act wording became apparent in November 2009, when a lawmaker said during debate about speeding up the start of the law that he had gotten complaints from voters about the loophole. Some credit card issuers were telling consumers they could not lower their interest rates because of the new restrictions in the new law. Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, pledged to work to fix the problem.

Federal regulators, who must review the law and write detailed guidelines for how banks and credit card issuers should implement its provisions, made the fix effective Feb. 22.

See related:Credit card reform law and you, Credit card issuers: Sorry, new law says we can’t cut your interest rates, Switching credit cards? It may cost more than you think, Consumers gain right to opt out of credit card changes

Editorial Disclaimer

The editorial content on this page is based solely on the objective assessment of our writers and is not driven by advertising dollars. It has not been provided or commissioned by the credit card issuers. However, we may receive compensation when you click on links to products from our partners.

What’s up next?

In Research and Statistics

Lending standards show signs of easing, Fed report says

Having spent much of 2009 making it tougher for consumers to get credit, banks largely stood pat in the final three months of the year, according to data released Monday by the Federal Reserve.

See more stories
Credit Card Rate Report Updated: September 16th, 2020
Cash Back

Questions or comments?

Contact us

Editorial corrections policies

Learn more

Join the Discussion

We encourage an active and insightful conversation among our users. Please help us keep our community civil and respectful. For your safety, do not disclose confidential or personal information such as bank account numbers or social security numbers. Anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

The editorial content on is not sponsored by any bank or credit card issuer. The journalists in the editorial department are separate from the company’s business operations. The comments posted below are not provided, reviewed or approved by any company mentioned in our editorial content. Additionally, any companies mentioned in the content do not assume responsibility to ensure that all posts and/or questions are answered.