BACK

Research and Statistics

FTC: Subprime credit card marketer must repay $114 million

Summary

The Federal Trade Commission has ended its suit against subprime credit card marketer CompuCredit Corp. with an agreement for the company to repay card users $114 million.

The editorial content below is based solely on the objective assessment of our writers and is not driven by advertising dollars. However, we may receive compensation when you click on links to products from our partners. Learn more about our advertising policy.

The content on this page is accurate as of the posting date; however, some of the offers mentioned may have expired. Please see the bank’s website for the most current version of card offers; and please review our list of best credit cards, or use our CardMatch™ tool to find cards matched to your needs.

Subprime credit card marketer CompuCredit Corp. must repay $114 million to card users and pay a $2.4 million civil penalty under a court settlement reached with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of deceptive practices.

According to a lawsuit filed by the FTC in June 2008 against the company, CompuCredit and a debt collection company it owned allegedly engaged in deceptive and abusive conduct in marketing subprime credit cards to millions of consumers. Subprime credit cards — also known as ‘fee harvesting’ cards in the industry — are marketed to people with bad credit. The cards typically carry low credit limits — as little as $300 to $500 — and feature security deposits and high upfront fees for such things as opening the account and monthly maintenance.

‘Fee harvesting’

The fees eat up most of the available credit and consumers are potentially subject to over-the-limit fees or are left without the use of the card. New credit card rules approved by the Federal Reserve Board attempt to make the cards more consumer friendly by banning fees that amount to more than 50 percent of the credit limit and requiring that fees totaling more than 25 percent of the available credit are repaid over six months rather than piled on up front. (SeeWhat the new credit card rules mean for you.)

“This settlement is a big win for consumers,” Lydia B. Parnes, the FTC’s director of consumer protection, said in a press release. “When signing up for a credit card, consumers have the right to know the truth about the amount of credit they are getting and the cost of that credit up front.”

Eligible consumers who still have CompuCredit accounts would be credited on their accounts for the amount of fees they were charged. People whose current balances are less than the amount of credits will get an estimated $3.7 million in cash refunds.

As part of the settlement, neither CompuCredit nor its subsidiary, Jefferson Capital Systems LLC, admitted violating the Federal Trade Commission Act provisions against unfair and deceptive trade practices.

To comment on this article, write to: Editors@CreditCards.com.

See related: Feds seek $200 million for ‘fee harvesting’ credit cards, Evils of ‘fee harvesting credit cards known for long time, 5 things to know about fee harvesting credit cards, Federal regulators issue sweeping new credit card rules

What’s up next?

In Research and Statistics

New rules don’t cover every credit card issue

New credit card industry rules are the most significant in three decades, but they don't go far enough to protect consumers from credit card abuses, lawmakers and advocates say. Here's what's missing.

Published: December 18, 2008

See more stories
Credit Card Rate Report Updated: August 21st, 2019
Business
15.55%
Airline
17.49%
Cash Back
17.63%
Reward
17.49%
Student
17.69%

Questions or comments?

Contact us

Editorial corrections policies

Learn more

Join the Discussion

We encourage an active and insightful conversation among our users. Please help us keep our community civil and respectful. For your safety, do not disclose confidential or personal information such as bank account numbers or social security numbers. Anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

The editorial content on CreditCards.com is not sponsored by any bank or credit card issuer. The journalists in the editorial department are separate from the company’s business operations. The comments posted below are not provided, reviewed or approved by any company mentioned in our editorial content. Additionally, any companies mentioned in the content do not assume responsibility to ensure that all posts and/or questions are answered.