Credit Cards
  Visa credit cardsMasterCard credit cardsAmerican Express credit cardsDiscover credit cards
Credit Cards Menu
Low Interest Credit Cards
Balance Transfer Cards
Instant Approval Cards
Reward Credit Cards
Cash Back Credit Cards
Airline Credit Cards
Business Credit Cards
Student Credit Cards
Prepaid & Debit Cards
Credit Card Specials
Search by Credit Quality
Excellent Credit
Good Credit
Fair Credit
Bad Credit
No Credit History
Bank Credit Cards
Advanta
American Express®
Bank of America®
Capital One®
Chase
Citi® Credit Cards
Discover®
First National Bank of Omaha
First PREMIER® Bank
HSBC Bank
MasterCard®
Orchard Bank®
Visa®
Credit Card News and Advice
News About Credit Cards
Credit Card News Archive
Credit Card Blogs
RSS News Feeds
Credit Card Newsletter
Credit Card Tools
Credit Card Calculators
Credit Card Terms & Glossary
PrivacyWise™
Credit Card Site Map
Accept Credit Cards
Merchant Account Providers
Merchant Account Articles
Online Credit Card Applications



 

Credit Cards > Credit Card News > Credit Card Fees: Merchant interchange fees and their critics


 Print 
 Email 

Critics challenge retailers on opposition to interchange fees

By Jeremy Simon

Merchant opposition to the interchange fees charged by credit card banks has been a big news item in the world of credit cards lately.  Retailers have charged that these fees raise prices, with some having gone so far as to take out ads in newspapers stating that interchange fees end up punishing the consumer.  But according to some critics of the merchants, they do not have the best interest of the credit card user in mind when they oppose these fees. 

Many stores have asked the government to lower interchange fees, which the merchants consider to be too high.  In lawsuits and appeals to state and federal government, retailers allege that the method of pricing the fees is anticompetitive.  Merchants note that they have little option but to accept interchange fees for taking credit cards. 

The argument that the interchange fees violate antitrust laws (because MasterCard and Visa establish uniform fees for member banks to charge) has so far been rejected by courts, which have noted that there are other credit card and payment methods, and because of the efficiencies of this pricing system. Without the fee-setting method in place, the card processors say, stores would need to negotiate with thousands of different banks to process customers' credit cards.     

In Australia, such cost transfers took place when the government listened to merchants and set the fees.  After the price controls were instituted in Australia, consumers there encountered higher annual fees and fewer reward programs such as airline miles.  According to a study, 30 to 40 percent of banks' lost interchange revenues were simply passed on to cardholders via higher costs.  Local newspaper the Australian reported that these consumers experienced no corresponding decline in merchandise prices -- although Aussie retailers did save over $450 million in U.S. dollars.    

Critics expects that if interchange fees are lowered in the U.S., the same would happen.

Published: November 14, 2006

Comments or questions, Story archive

Three most recent Merchant accounts stories:



USA (English)   |   USA (Español)   |   UK   |   Australia   |   Canada