CreditCards.com editorial, corrections policies
Contact us info to comment on news articles, correct errors
Since its establishment in 2007, CreditCards.com's editorial department has covered the fast-changing payments industry, publishing breaking news and information of value to consumers every weekday.
CreditCards.com is solely responsible for the information and opinions published on the news and blog portions of its websites. No payment or other consideration has been received from any company, product or person mentioned within. The company makes its revenue chiefly by presenting consumers with side-by-side listings of cards and their features, and collects a fee from card issuers when consumers use the site to obtain a card. The journalists in the editorial department are separate from the company's business operations. CreditCards.com's editors and authors average more than 10 years' journalism experience, and its staffers have won mulitiple journalism awards.
CreditCards.com's editorial department strives to publish objective, thorough and accurate news articles and blogs. If you believe we have published something in error or wish to comment on an article, please contact us by e-mail at Editors@CreditCards.com, by fax to (512) 249-5209, or in writing to:
9430 Research Blvd
Bldg. 4, Suite 400
Austin, TX 78759
Phone: 512-996-8663, ext. 131
We will correct minor errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar on the website without notice.
When we correct significant errors of fact or substance, we will note those corrections on this page and in a note within the corrected article.
We seek a broad range of viewpoints. As such, we will not correct opinions expressed by people we quote in news articles, or the opinions of those who we solicit to write op-ed pieces for us. We do welcome opposing points of view.
If you wish to correct an article, please send the following information to Editors@CreditCards.com:
1. The URL (Web address) of the article on which you wish to have us correct.
2. Your name and e-mail address. This information will never be shared with any third party, or used in any way except to verify your information, and to contact you for further details.
3. The error. If appropriate, let us know how we can verify that we erred.
This corrections policy applies to articles written or commissioned by CreditCards.com's editorial department. For questions about information presented by the company's other departments, see the "Contact us" section.
July 1, 2013
The story headlined "Bill to curb employer credit check passes N.Y. Assembly" reported nine states had laws limiting pre-employment credit checks. It omitted a 10th state, Nevada, which passed such a law in May.
April 29, 2013
The story "Card add-on products stage a comeback" mischaracterized Capital One's free credit monitoring services as applying to a secured card for students. The credit monitoring comes with the company's secured card and its Journey credit card for students.
Jan. 25, 2013
The story "Gift card scams now allowed" misspelled the name of Mitch Goldstone's company, ScanMyPhotos.com.
Oct. 27, 2011
The story "Gift card scams: How to spot them, how to avoid being a victim" misspelled the name of Peter Camenzind.
Oct. 25, 2011
A story headlined "7 ways to protect your credit rating during unemployment" incorrectly referred to employers checking prospective employees' credit scores. While employers may and do check job applicants' credit reports, the credit bureaus do not provide them with the credit scores derived from the reports.
June 8, 2011
As originally published, a pair of stories titled "Cure your defaulted student loan in six steps" and "Debunking a myth about wage garnishment and student loans" asserted that under the federal program for rehabilitating defaulted student loans, it is solely at the debtor's discretion to decide what a "reasonable and affordable" repayment amount would be. While the debtor has considerable input in setting the amount, the decision on the repayment amount is not solely up to the debtor. It is a sum negotiated between the debtor and creditor that requires the debtor to document income and ability to pay.
April 25, 2011
A story published April 20, 2011, that now carries the headline "Shift in student credit cards sends interest rates higher" originally had a misleading headline, one which could be construed to say a Chase move had directly impacted the national average credit card APR. Chase's decision to no longer market a card triggered a change in the CreditCards.com database of cards, which indirectly caused a change in the national average.
April 21, 2011
As originally published, a story headlined "Study: Prepaid card can be better deal than a checking account," published March 31, 2011, indicated that funds held on individuals' reloadable debit cards were not FDIC insured. They are. A 2008 FDIC ruling made clear that even if a debit card issuer is not a bank, and it pools the funds of the debit card holders into a single account, FDIC insurance "passes through" to individual account holders.
Oct. 6, 2010
A reader Q&A titled "Act fast when hit by credit card fraud, even if mom and dad were to blame," published Oct. 6, 2010, got wrong the name of the Identity Theft Resource Center.
June 26, 2010
The article "4 keys to credit, debit card zero-liability policies," published June 10, 2010, incorrectly characterized the way PIN-based debit card transactions are processed.
May 20, 2010
A reader Q&A titled "Comparing desperate options: bankruptcy vs. debt negotiation" published May 3, 2010, incorrectly said credit scores are used by employers in hiring decisions. They are not, credit reports are.
March 16, 2010
The article "Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged again," published Jan. 10, 2010, contained an erroneous date for the last time the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee last raised its target for the federal funds rate.
Feb. 13, 2010
An article about the FTC considering new regulations on 'negative options' misstated the nature of the product that triggered one consumer's complaint.
Feb. 2, 2010
Two articles -- "A guide to the Credit CARD Act of 2009" and "New Fed rules don't cover business, corporate cards" -- incorrectly described which service members are entitled to interest rate protection under the Service Members' Civil Relief Act. The act's benefits apply to active duty military personnel.
Nov. 9, 2009
A pair of stories published Nov. 5, 2009, erroneously said Discover cards would boost penalty rates in the wake of the passage of a credit card reform law. The mistake was in the stories headlined "Discover debuts reform-law compliant credit card terms" and "Rates steady this week, but banks keep tweaking other terms." The first story also stated that Capital One had pledged to forgo rate increases immediately as a result of the coming of that reform law; Capital One says it will be in compliance with the law's restrictions, which go into effect in 2010.
Sept. 9, 2009
An article titled Personal finance boot camps fight debt with hard-nosed approach, incorrectly stated the location of a financial boot camp run by Travis. It is in St. Louis.
June 17, 2009
An article titled 10 things you should know about identity theft, stated that your hotel room keys contain your personal information. This is an urban legend and is not true.
March 2, 2009
The article titled 7 credit card myths debunked, stated stated that Sam's Club only accepted Discover and its own branded credit card. The chain also accepts MasterCard for in-store purchases, though they do not take American Express or Visa.
Feb. 25, 2009
In an article titled How different are Visa, AmEx, MasterCard and Discover?, it was incorrectly stated that Discover exclusively issues its own cards. The firm partners with several other card-issuing banks.
Feb. 18, 2009
In an article headlined Four reasons you should get a department store credit card, the company name DebtGoal.com was misspelled.
Feb. 12, 2009
In a pair of Q&A columns titled Take these steps to opt out of a rate increase and How to opt out of credit card rate increases, the ability of consumers to opt out of interest rate increases was overstated. At the time of publication, opting out was not a right, but a privilege, granted by most, but not all, card issuers. Since publication, opting out has become a right mandated by federal law.
Feb. 9, 2009
In a story headlined Wipe the slate clean by settling old debts, it was incorrectly stated that by paying off delinquent debt that went into collection, your credit score will improve. In fact, it is the original delinquency that is factored into your credit score, and paying that account will not improve your score.
Feb. 5, 2009
A story headlined Experian FICO score may soon be off-limits to consumers included a miscount of the number of credit score-related products that would be impacted by the end of a deal between Fair Isaac and Experian.
Jan. 19, 2009
A story headlined 7 things not to do when you've maxed out your credit cards incorrectly characterized Thrive. It is an online personal financial advisory service.
July 2, 2008
A story headlined Credit checks for job applicants become more common, originally published July 1, 2008, misspelled the name of Todd L. Moss, president of Crimcheck.com.
July 1, 2008
The Credit Guy column, What VantageScores are, how they work, originally published June 30, 2008, mischaracterized how consumers may obtain their VantageScore credit reports.
Updated: February 21, 2013
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.
Did you like this story? Then sign up for CreditCards.com’s weekly e-newsletter for the latest news, advice, articles and tips. It's FREE. Once a week you will receive the top credit card industry news in your inbox. Sign up now!